Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• addressing whether the trial court erred “in concluding that the appellant’s motion to amend the trial transcript [pursuant to O.C.G.A. § 5-6-41(f)] lacked justiciable issues of law or fact”
• OCGA § 5-6-41 (f), which authorizes the correction of transcripts to facilitate appellate review, does not authorize corrections “after appellate review is concluded”
• OCGA § 5-6-41 (f), which authorizes the correction of transcripts to facilitate appellate review, does not authorize corrections \after appellate review is concluded\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Jennings v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2005-12-16· cited 8×
• Williams v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2019-05-20· cited 5×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2011-09-12· cited 4×
• James Stewart, Jr. v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2018-11-01

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Mallory v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1999-06-01· cited 48×
• Wright v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1997-01-21· cited 17×
• Wigley v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1989-11-28· cited 5×