Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 79 Fla. 831
  • 84 So. 919

Syllabus

<p>Statements by tbe prosecuting attorney'tbat are entirely outside tbe evidence and cannot properly be inferred from tbe evidence adduced, and tbat tend' to prejudice tbe defendant, should not be permitted, and when sucb statements are brought to tbe attention of tbe court it is its duty to stop him at once, and if it fails to do so when requested, and tbe impropriety is great, and exception is duly taken, it is ground for a new trial.</p>

Judges: Browne, Ellis, Taylor, West, Whitfield

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

4 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.