Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• indicating that those who drink knowing that they have committed crimes while drunk in the past, as well as those who drink knowing that they will be driving, commit a malum in se act by their drinking

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Whack v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-06-23· cited 79×
• State v. Haliski
  Supreme Court of New Jersey· 1995-04-20· cited 71×
• LOPEZ-MEZA
  Board of Immigration Appeals· 1999-07-01· cited 61×
• Dancer v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1986-03-14· cited 35×
• Bell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-02-10· cited 14×
• Berg v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1985-12-27· cited 8×
• Koteles v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1983-04-01· cited 7×
• Jansen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1988-11-04· cited 6×
• Richard Dorsey v. State of Alaska
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 2021-01-22· cited 1×

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Nell v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-04-01· cited 46×
• State v. Alexander
  Court of Appeals of Washington· 1974-04-15· cited 27×
• Griffith v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-03-04· cited 22×
• O'LEARY v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1979-12-28· cited 19×
• People v. DIST. COURT IN & FOR TWENTIETH JUD. DIST.
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1976-10-18· cited 15×
• Alexander v. State
  Alaska Supreme Court· 1978-05-12· cited 11×
• Wasson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-08· cited 9×
• Wright v. State
  Court of Appeals of Alaska· 1982-10-01· cited 8×