District Court of Appeal of Florida· 4/29/1992
Wright v. State
Citations
- 599 So. 2d 179
- 1992 WL 86324
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding habitual offender sentence could not be imposed once service of guidelines sentence had begun
- holding habitual offender sentence could not be imposed once service of guidelines sentence had begun
- “The issue in this appeal is whether Wright’s first sentence was a legal sentence. If it was, double jeopardy prevents the trial court from imposing a harsher sentence at a subsequent hearing.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Parker
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
6 cases in this archive cite this case.
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-17· cited 12×
- King v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-12-15· cited 10×
- State v. SwiderDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-14· cited 9×
- Clark v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-10-05· cited 6×
- Pierre v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-05-26· cited 1×
- Edward v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2019-03-13
Cites
4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.