District Court of Appeal of Florida· 6/15/2005
Wright v. State
Citations
- 920 So. 2d 21
- 2005 WL 1398026
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that section 893.101 “does not require the defendant to prove or disprove knowledge”
- explaining that section 893.101 “does not require the defendant to prove or disprove knowledge”
- “An affirmative defense does not concern itself with the elements of the offense at all; it concedes them” and “asserts a good excuse or reason.”
- “The statute does two things: it makes possession of a controlled substance a general intent crime ... and, second, it allows a defendant to assert lack of knowledge as an affirmative defense.”
- the legislature has broad authority to determine intent requirements in defining crimes and courts must defer to the legislative determination on such matters as long as there is a rational basis for the legislative action
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Stone
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
19 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AdkinsSupreme Court of Florida· 2012-07-12· cited 570×
- Maestas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2011-11-30· cited 257×
- Shelton v. Secretary, Department of CorrectionsM.D. Florida· 2011-07-27· cited 77×
- State v. WashingtonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-06-27· cited 16×
- Harris v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-06-27· cited 12×
- Taylor v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-17· cited 12×
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-07-13· cited 9×
- Ramirez v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-04· cited 7×
- Lamore v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2008-05-30· cited 7×
- Quick v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-11-03· cited 6×
- Sloss v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-09-19· cited 5×
- Miller v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-05-26· cited 5×
- Tolbert v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-04-26· cited 3×
- Thomas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-08-31· cited 2×
- Mitchell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-10-05· cited 2×
- Johnson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-09-28
- Monts v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-03-08
- Adams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2006-05-10
- Branch v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2007-03-14
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Sanford v. RubinSupreme Court of Florida· 1970-07-01· cited 197×
- Chicone v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1996-10-24· cited 155×
- Trushin v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1982-11-04· cited 96×
- Scott v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 2002-01-03· cited 59×
- Mills v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1909-06-15· cited 47×
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida· 1990-09-27· cited 31×
- Brazill v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-05-14· cited 16×
- Alexander v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1984-05-16· cited 14×
- Norman v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2002-08-28· cited 13×
- Fitzgerald v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1976-11-04· cited 10×
- White v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-04-12· cited 9×
- Carr v. Crosby Builders Supply Company, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1973-08-29· cited 8×
- Reese v. STATE, DEPT. OF TRANSP.District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-11-17· cited 3×
- State v. SchuylerDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-04-06· cited 1×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.