Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that probation could not be revoked for defendant’s failure to undergo DNA testing where probation order did not require such testing
• alleged probation violation based on defendant's failure to undergo DNA testing as instructed by his probation officer could not be considered at probation revocation hearing when original probation order did not require defendant to submit to DNA testing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Meade v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2001-11-16· cited 15×
• Lane v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-06-30· cited 4×
• Shelton v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2003-08-13