Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2/13/1998
Wright v. State
Citations
- 717 So. 2d 444
- 1998 WL 57745
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- issue regarding sufficiency of the evidence upon which the revocation of probation was based was not preserved for appellate review because appellant failed to object to the trial court
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
4 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Chenault v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2000-06-30· cited 25×
- Holden v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2001-09-28· cited 15×
- McIntosh v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1999-12-30· cited 10×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 2004-06-25· cited 4×
Cites
8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Armstrong v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1975-03-13· cited 416×
- Ex Parte StateSupreme Court of Alabama· 1992-07-02· cited 121×
- Puckett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-03-08· cited 109×
- Trice v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-10-17· cited 54×
- Martin v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-04-19· cited 13×
- Davidson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1996-08-23· cited 9×
- Springfield v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1998-02-13· cited 5×
- Wadsworth v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama· 1997-09-26· cited 3×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.