Wright v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even where defendant may cross-examine state's witness as to hope of benefit related to a pending case, \the substantive facts underlying an open juvenile case would not generally be admissible\
• even where defendant may cross-examine state’s witness as to hope of benefit related to a pending case, “the substantive facts underlying an open juvenile case would not generally be admissible”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

3 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Pate v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2012-03-27· cited 9×
• Carston v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2021-02-15· cited 9×
• Hibbs v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 2009-07-06· cited 8×

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Jackson v. Virginia
  Supreme Court· 1979-10-01· cited 79,490×
• Chapman v. California
  Supreme Court· 1967-03-27· cited 23,069×
• Davis v. Alaska
  Supreme Court· 1974-02-27· cited 5,953×
• Hines v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 1982-04-07· cited 153×
• Mangum v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2001-11-19· cited 50×
• Watkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-05-19· cited 41×
• Smith v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-02-24· cited 27×
• Baynes v. State
  Court of Appeals of Georgia· 1995-10-05· cited 15×
• Brown v. State
  Supreme Court of Georgia· 2003-02-10· cited 11×