Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 487 S.E.2d 405
  • 226 Ga. App. 848
  • 97 Fulton County D. Rep. 2235
  • 1997 Ga. App. LEXIS 694

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • testimony regarding first name was “verbal act” not introduced to prove the truth of the matter asserted
  • testimony regarding first name was “verbal act” not introduced to prove the truth of the matter asserted
  • OCGA § 17-16-2 (a) requires a defendant to provide \written notice to the prosecuting attorney that such defendant elects to have this article apply to the defendant's case.\ Absent such notice, the provisions of OCGA § 17-16-4 (a) do not apply.
  • OCGA § 17-16-2 (a) requires a defendant to provide “written notice to the prosecuting attorney that such defendant elects to have this article apply to the defendant’s case.” Absent such notice, the provisions of OCGA § 17-16-4 (a) do not apply.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Harold R. Banke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

9 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.