Skip to main content

Wright v. State

Citations

  • 665 S.E.2d 374
  • 292 Ga. App. 673
  • 2008 Fulton County D. Rep. 2499
  • 2008 Ga. App. LEXIS 832

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reversing defendant’s conviction on aggravated stalking in part because there was “no evidence that [the alleged victim] was in reasonable fear for her safety”
  • reversing defendant’s conviction of aggravated stalking in part because there was “no evidence that [the alleged victim] was in reasonable fear for her safety”
  • reversing defendant’s conviction of aggravated stalking in part because there was “no evidence that [the alleged victim] was in reasonable fear for her safety”
  • evidence failed to show defendant stalked his ex-wife because, although the defendant entered his ex-wife’s house after she revoked his consent to do so, her testimony showed that she did not think he would hurt her or their children
  • evidence insufficient to show that victim was in reasonable fear for her safety when there had been a recent pattern of consensual contacts and victim pursued defendant after he left the residence even though he had the hammer he had taken away from her
  • evidence insufficient to show that victim was in reasonable fear for her safety when there had been a recent pattern of consensual contacts and victim pursued defendant after he left the residence even though he had the hammer he had taken away from her

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Adams, Smith, Mikell

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.