Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 7/26/1976
Wright v. State
Citations
- 552 P.2d 1157
- 1976 OK CR 166
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- recognizing application of principle to LEOFF statutes
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Brett, Bussey, Bliss
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
8 cases in this archive cite this case.
- State v. AndertonUtah Supreme Court· 1983-08-15· cited 35×
- Caffey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1983-04-06· cited 27×
- State v. CurryIdaho Court of Appeals· 1982-06-29· cited 24×
- McFatridge v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1981-07-30· cited 14×
- Sockey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1984-02-06· cited 9×
- Brown v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-05-31· cited 8×
- Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1977-03-02· cited 7×
- Adams v. City of SeattleCourt of Appeals of Washington· 2013-02-04· cited 1×
Cites
7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1969-01-27· cited 6,223×
- United States v. Titus Thomas, AKA TeeFifth Circuit· 1974-01-22· cited 113×
- Leonard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1969-04-09· cited 46×
- United States v. Jimmy Joy Neal and C. W. ScottTenth Circuit· 1974-07-22· cited 37×
- Luker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1972-12-27· cited 30×
- Guthrey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1973-02-28· cited 20×
- McMillon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma· 1952-07-23· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.