Wrenn v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that district court is “not required to hold an in-court lineup or to force the state to furnish multi-person confrontations during the trial”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Eddlemon v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-12-05· cited 102×
• Mullen v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1987-01-15· cited 15×
• Baskin v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 1984-06-06· cited 13×
• Alexander v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-15· cited 13×
• Mallard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1983-11-02· cited 8×
• Wortham v. State
  Court of Appeals of Texas· 1995-08-16· cited 7×
• Mark Dwayne Maxwell v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-01-21· cited 6×
• Lucas v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-14· cited 5×
• Manuel Perez v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-25

Cites

7 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ward v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-23· cited 83×
• Dunlap v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-12-07· cited 21×
• Taylor v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-09-16· cited 16×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-01-20· cited 14×
• Martin v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-11-25· cited 14×
• Bennett v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1970-04-01· cited 8×
• Forgey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1961-06-14· cited 7×