Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1/20/1971
Johnson v. State
Citations
- 462 S.W.2d 955
- 1971 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 1727
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- upholding denial of motion for “multi-person show up at the time of any in-court identification,” noting such request to be “an ingenious contention”
- upheld denial of motion for “multi-person show up at the time of any in-court identification,” noting such request to be “an ingenious contention”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Morrison
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Ward v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1971-11-23· cited 83×
- Alexander v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-01-26· cited 38×
- Lyons v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-12-12· cited 38×
- Hicks v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-06-21· cited 17×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas· 1987-10-15· cited 14×
- Dorsey v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-10-11· cited 13×
- Wrenn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-03-01· cited 11×
- Sapp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1972-02-02· cited 11×
- Mosley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1973-05-16· cited 10×
- Mark Dwayne Maxwell v. StateTex. App. Ct., 3rd Dist. (Austin)· 2000-01-21· cited 6×
- Manuel Perez v. StateTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 2006-05-25
Cites
2 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.