Skip to main content

Worley v. State

Citations

  • 263 So. 2d 613

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
  • officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
  • officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
  • voiceprints properly admitted to corroborate voice identification
  • voiceprints properly admitted to corroborate voice identification

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Walden

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

20 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.