District Court of Appeal of Florida· 5/19/1972
Worley v. State
Citations
- 263 So. 2d 613
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
- officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
- officer who received anonymous bomb threats was permitted to identify the defendant by voice as the person who placed the calls; the Fourth District noted that “[t]he credibility of such evidence is clearly a jury question”
- voiceprints properly admitted to corroborate voice identification
- voiceprints properly admitted to corroborate voice identification
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Walden
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 668×
- Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-09-06· cited 224×
- Commonwealth v. TopaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania· 1977-02-28· cited 215×
- United States v. Herman Franks, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Max Britton, (Two Cases). United States of America v. Boyce MitchellSixth Circuit· 1975-06-23· cited 185×
- United States v. Roland Addison, United States of America v. Albert Henry RaymondD.C. Circuit· 1974-06-06· cited 143×
- Commonwealth v. VitelloMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1978-09-26· cited 122×
- United States v. Carl Joseph Baller, Jr.Fourth Circuit· 1975-07-09· cited 105×
- State v. WilliamsSupreme Judicial Court of Maine· 1978-07-10· cited 103×
- Commonwealth v. LykusMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1975-03-27· cited 85×
- Patrick Albert Evans v. State of FloridaSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-11-12· cited 38×
- People v. LawCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1974-06-25· cited 37×
- Hodo v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-02-22· cited 22×
- United States v. SampleE.D. Pennsylvania· 1974-06-10· cited 21×
- Barrientos v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-06· cited 20×
- Brown v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals· 1978-03-28· cited 17×
- D'Arc v. D'ArcNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1978-03-14· cited 12×
- Vilsaint v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 2013-11-20· cited 11×
- State v. FreeLouisiana Court of Appeal· 1986-08-20· cited 5×
- Payne v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1990-05-23· cited 1×
- Patrick Albert Evans v. State of Florida Corrected OpinionSupreme Court of Florida· 2015-12-10
Cites
14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- People v. EllisCalifornia Supreme Court· 1966-12-23· cited 153×
- State v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1967-06-06· cited 98×
- People v. KingCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1968-10-10· cited 63×
- Coppolino v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-11-08· cited 59×
- State Ex Rel. Trimble v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota· 1971-11-26· cited 49×
- State v. CaryNew Jersey Superior Court App Division· 1968-02-09· cited 29×
- Mack v. StateSupreme Court of Florida· 1907-06-15· cited 29×
- State v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1970-04-21· cited 28×
- United States v. RaymondDistrict of Columbia· 1972-02-02· cited 23×
- Weinshenker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1969-02-25· cited 21×
- United States v. WrightUnited States Court of Military Appeals· 1967-08-11· cited 19×
- State v. CarySupreme Court of New Jersey· 1969-02-06· cited 11×
- Cason v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-05-22· cited 10×
- Simon v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida· 1968-04-09· cited 7×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.