United States v. Carl Joseph Baller, Jr.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming admission of voice spectrography expert analysis “despite doubts within the scientific community about its absolute accuracy,” in part because the tapes compared in the analysis were played to the jury
• finding no abuse of discretion in admitting voice print analysis evidence
• that hair analyst could not positively identify hair as defendant's went to weight, not admissibility
• that hair analyst could not positively identify hair as defendant's went to weight, not admissibility

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).