Workers' Compensation Trust Fund v. Saunders

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• describing a “monopolistic” state scheme as requiring “payments only to a state-run insurance fund”
• describing a “monopolistic” state scheme as requiring “payments only to a state-run insurance fund”
• the first and third prongs of the Lorber test have been the source of much conflicting case law
• Imposition of assessment on employer for failing to have worker’s compensation insurance was discretionary, thereby disqualifying the assessment from designation as a tax
• discretionary nature of exaction was disqualifying in itself

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).