In Re Karen Lee Camilli, Debtor. Industrial Commission of Arizona v. Karen Lee Camilli

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• analyzing Suburban I and Suburban ID- Therefore, the court refined the Lorber test to require (1) that the pecuniary obligation be universally applicable to similarly situated entities; and (2
• reimbursement claim was tax claim, in part because debtor’s obligation to repay workers’ compensation benefits was “wholly beyond the control of the debtor”
• no private creditors have similar claims where “[n]o private entity competes with [fund] to pay ‘insurance’ claims for which no insurance has been bought”
• debtor’s obligation to reimburse state for worker’s compensation paid to debtor’s uninsured employee was an involuntary pecuniary burden under Lorber because obligation to reimburse state was a statutorily created obligation
• under Arizona law there is “universal” obligation to compensate employees of uninsured employers
• “Because the obligation 26 in this case meets the four additional requirements set forth by the Sixth Circuit in Suburban I, as well as the criteria of Lorber, there is no need to decide whether the 27 Suburban I requirements must be met in all cases.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).