Woody v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We disagree with the trial court’s conclusion that a notation on the disposition sheet, next to the award of credit for 154 days, stating ‘-agrees to T/S,’ conclusively refuted Woody’s claim to be entitled to 548 days”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

5 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Rudicil v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2010-04-07· cited 3×
• Ponce v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-12-23· cited 2×
• Brown v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2009-02-25
• Kristina Lawhon-Griffis v. State of Florida
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2015-12-02
• Walker v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2012-11-16

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• State v. Mancino
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1998-06-11· cited 282×
• Daily v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1999-04-07· cited 12×
• Lee v. State
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2000-03-08· cited 3×