Skip to main content

Woods v. State

Citations

  • 90 Miss. 245
  • 43 So. 433

Syllabus

<p>1. Criminal Law and Procedure. Homicide. Assault with intent to murder. Instructions. Deliberation. Use of weapon.</p> <p>In a prosecution for an assault with intent to murder, instructions authorizing a conviction as charged “even if the blow was struck with a single-barreled shotgun without malice” and announcing that “the law presumes malice from the unlawful and deliberate use of a deadly weapon,” are erroneous as justifying an inference that the judge thought there was unlawful and deliberate use of the loaded gun as a deadly weapon, although it was not fired.</p> <p>2. Same. Evidence. Character of injured party.</p> <p>The state cannot show the good character of the party assaulted in a prosecution for the assault where his character was not attacked.'</p>

Judges: Caliroon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.