Richardson v. State
Citations
- 123 Miss. 232
- 85 So. 184
Syllabus
<p>1. Homicide. Evidence of deceased’s good reputation inadmissible, where not attacked.</p> <p>Upon the trial of one indicted for murder, evidence of the general good reputation of the deceased is incompetent, when the defendant had made no attack of any kind upon deceased’s character.</p> <p>2. Criminal Law. Defendant’s statement that accused tried to kill him held self-serving.</p> <p>A statement by the accused to his wife a'few minutes after the fatal shots were fired that, “Sheppard tried to kill me, and I shot him, is a self-serving declaration, and inadmissible. ( ■</p> <p>3. Homicide. Words of reproach will not reduce murder to manslaughter.</p> <p>No mere words of reproach, however grievous or provoking, unaccompanied by any assault or mutual combat, are sufficient provocation to reduce an intentional and unjustifiable homicide from murder to manslaughter.</p>
Judges: Ethridge, Expressed, Stevens, Sykes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
7 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Johnson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-05-05· cited 327×
- Stevens v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1984-10-17· cited 90×
- Newell v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-11-06· cited 20×
- Shorter v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1972-01-24· cited 12×
- Robinson v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1982-08-11· cited 9×
- Hinton v. StateMississippi Supreme Court· 1950-04-10· cited 5×
- Steel v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Virginia· 1931-09-17· cited 4×
Cites
3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.