Washington Supreme Court· 12/20/2007

Woods v. Kittitas County

Citations

162 Wash. 2d 597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

holding that a site-specific land use decision cannot be challenged for violations of the GMA
noting that a superior court lacks jurisdiction over challenges to plans or regulations based on the GMA
noting that a superior court lacks 7 Town of Woodway v. Snohomish County No. 88405-6 jurisdiction over challenges to plans or regulations based on the GMA
explaining the statutory framework for review of local jurisdictions' land use decisions
comprehensive plans serve as \`guide[s]'\ or \`blueprint[s]'\ (internal quotation marks omitted) (quoting Citizens for Mount Vernon v. City of Mount Vernon, 133 Wash.2d 861, 873, 947 P.2d 1208 (1997)
“a proposed land use decision must only generally conform, rather than strictly conform, to the comprehensive plan”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Becker, Fairhurst

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

51 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Woods v. Kittitas County

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.