Skip to main content

Woodruff v. State

Citations

  • 330 S.W.3d 709
  • 2010 Tex. App. LEXIS 9569
  • 2010 WL 4909597

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that dismissal is appropriate only when the suppression of evidence is insufficient to purge the taint of the violation
  • concluding evidence was sufficient to support conviction for capital murder based in part on accused’s access to a firearm
  • applying work-product doctrine to a criminal case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Morriss, Carter, Moseley

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

13 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

44 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.