Wood v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that NRS 176.015 \does not limit in any manner a sentencing coures existing discretion to receive other admissible evidence\ from a nonvictim so long as the evidence is relevant and reliable
• explaining that NRS 176.015 does not act as a statutory limit on the evidence that a district court may receive in sentencing and the court has discretion to consider other admissible evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

8 cases in this archive cite this case.

• McConnell v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-12-29· cited 95×
• State v. Frost
  Supreme Court of Louisiana· 1998-12-01· cited 58×
• State v. SECOND JUDICIAL DIST. CT.(PULLIN)
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-07-24· cited 33×
• Gilman v. Nevada State Board of Veterinary Medical Examiners
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2004-05-19· cited 26×
• State v. Barren
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2012-06-28· cited 17×
• Powell v. City of Colorado Springs
  Colorado Court of Appeals· 2006-04-10· cited 7×
• Picetti v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2008-09-11· cited 6×
• APARICIO (HENRY) VS. STATE
  Nevada Supreme Court· 2021-10-07· cited 1×

Cites

3 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Silks v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1976-02-12· cited 154×
• Randell v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1993-02-04· cited 42×
• Castillo v. State
  Nevada Supreme Court· 1994-05-23· cited 22×