Wood v. Spencer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that due diligence requires an assessment of what knowledge of the facts “fairly may be imputed to” a reasonable person in the petitioner’s po- sition
• holding that due diligence under § 2244(d)(1)(D) is an objective test
• holding that the prisoner was not entitled to statutory tolling under Section 2244(d)(1)(B
• holding that due diligence under § 2244(d)(1)(D) is an objective test
• finding that a prosecutor’s failure to produce Brady material was not an 7 impediment to petitioner filing his habeas petition
• finding that Brady violation could not fairly be said to have prevented petitioner from filing timely federal habeas petition

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).