Gaskins v. Duval

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that one year period began to run “on April 25, 1996, the day after AED-PA’s enactment”
• recognizing that one year period began to run “on April 25, 1996, the day after AEDPA’s enactment”
• recognizing that one year period began to run “on April 25, 1996, the day after AEDPA’s enactment”
• observing that not tolling the gap in time would not have altered the disposition of the case
• applying section 2244(d)(2) tolling provision to section 2254 petition involving conviction which became final prior to April 24, 1996
• applying section 2244(d)(2) tolling provision to section 2254 petition involving conviction which became final prior to April 24, 1996

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).