Wood v. B&S Enterprises, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no entitlement to jury instructions on employee’s use of cell phone when “there was no evidence” that employee was using an employer-supplied cell phone at the time of the accident
• “a juror who indicates a willingness to try to be objective and [has no] reservations relate[d] to a party may be eligible for service”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).