Clo White Co. v. Lattimore

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a jury question was created as to the employer’s potential liability for its employee’s actions, where evidence “supported] the conclusion that [the employee] may have actually been on the phone regarding matters of company business at the time of the accident”
• saying that an employer cannot be held liable for an accident that occurs while 24 an employee is traveling to or from work in the absence of “special circumstances,” and concluding that such special circumstances existed
• employee’s use of cell phone for work at time of the accident raised factual question about special circumstances exception

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).