Womack v. Del Papa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that petitioner failed to demonstrate that he received ineffective assistance in the absence of any evidence beyond his “own self-serving statement” that his attorney rendered deficient performance
• finding that the trial court informed the defendant of the potential sentence and thus the defendant could not demonstrate prejudice from his attorney’s predictions
• rejecting a petitioner’s claim, in part, because 14 “[o]ther than [the petitioner]’s own self-serving statement, there [was] no evidence” to support his 15 allegations
• rejecting a 2 petitioner’s claim, in part, because “[o]ther than [the petitioner]’s own self-serving 3 statement, there [was] no evidence” to support his allegations
• rejecting a 20 petitioner’s claim, in part, because “[o]ther than [the petitioner]’s own self-serving statement, there 21 [was] no evidence” to support his allegations
• rejecting a petitioner’s 16 claim, in part, because “[o]ther than [the petitioner]’s own self-serving statement, there [was] no evidence” to support his allegations

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).