United States v. Hipolito Rivera-Ramirez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding reading of unusually detailed indictment was adequate under Rule 11 to avoid reversal for “manifest injustice”
• “[S]olemn declarations made in open court carry a strong presumption of verity.”
• “[S]olemn declarations made in open court carry a strong presumption of verity.”
• “[S]olemn declarations made in open court carry a strong presumption of verity.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).