Tenth Circuit· 8/3/1987
Wolfenbarger v. Williams
Citations
- 826 F.2d 930
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that exigent circumstances did not support a warrantless search of a pawnshop where officers had placed a hold on items seized
- concluding that exigent circumstances did not support a warrantless search of a pawnshop where officers had placed a hold on items seized
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Barrett, Brown, Seymour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
20 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Horton v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1990-06-04· cited 2,923×
- Burns v. ReedSupreme Court· 1991-05-30· cited 1,988×
- Medicare&medicaid Gu 37,414 Pueblo Neighborhood Health Centers, Inc., and Oliver P. Pacheco v. Joseph E. Losavio, Jr.Tenth Circuit· 1988-05-24· cited 437×
- Richard Marx, Individually and Kristina Marx, a Minor v. Glenn H. Gumbinner, Bruce H. Colton and Pamela J. RoebuckEleventh Circuit· 1988-09-20· cited 64×
- Surplus Store and Exchange, Inc. v. City of DelphiSeventh Circuit· 1991-04-05· cited 64×
- Landers v. JamesonSupreme Court of Arkansas· 2003-12-04· cited 25×
- Eva Garrett, Individually and as Administratrix for the Estate of Linda Kay Johnson, Deceased v. Lloyd Rader and Norman SmithTenth Circuit· 1987-10-13· cited 23×
- State v. HamiltonSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1990-04-24· cited 17×
- Cathy Burns v. Rick ReedSeventh Circuit· 1990-02-06· cited 13×
- G & G Jewelry, Inc. v. City Of OaklandNinth Circuit· 1993-03-31· cited 11×
- Winters v. Board of County CommissionersTenth Circuit· 1993-09-02· cited 11×
- Wolfenbarger v. WilliamsTenth Circuit· 1987-08-20· cited 8×
- Naugle v. WitneyD. Utah· 1990-12-31· cited 7×
- Smith v. WalshW.D. Oklahoma· 1993-09-29· cited 3×
- Bentley v. Cleveland County Board Of County CommissionersTenth Circuit· 1994-11-29· cited 2×
- Flavel v. LogsdonD. Oregon· 1989-08-15· cited 2×
- Frohmader v. WayneD. Colorado· 1991-06-07· cited 1×
- Prager v. LaFAVERD. Kansas· 1998-04-10· cited 1×
- Bentley v. Cleveland County Board of County Commissioners ex rel. Cleveland CountyTenth Circuit· 1994-11-29· cited 1×
- Zawacki v. City of Colorado SpringsD. Colorado· 1991-03-20· cited 1×
Cites
37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court· 1982-06-24· cited 22,846×
- Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court· 1972-06-29· cited 14,284×
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court· 1987-06-25· cited 12,768×
- Coolidge v. New HampshireSupreme Court· 1971-06-21· cited 9,038×
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court· 1985-06-19· cited 8,858×
- Pembaur v. City of CincinnatiSupreme Court· 1986-03-25· cited 6,061×
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1960-03-28· cited 4,796×
- United States v. VentrescaSupreme Court· 1965-03-01· cited 4,171×
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court· 1972-10-10· cited 3,921×
- Gomez v. ToledoSupreme Court· 1980-05-27· cited 2,697×
- Davis v. SchererSupreme Court· 1984-08-16· cited 2,605×
- Chapman v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1961-04-03· cited 891×
- Louisville Joint Stock Land Bank v. RadfordSupreme Court· 1935-05-27· cited 691×
- K-B Trucking Company and Keith Collins, Cross-Appellants v. Riss International Corporation and World Leasing, Inc., Cross-AppelleesTenth Circuit· 1985-05-28· cited 195×
- Contreras v. Grower Shipper Vegetable Ass'n of Central CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1974-02-19· cited 132×
- V. Stevens Kite v. Clarence M. Kelley, Director, Federal Bureau of InvestigationTenth Circuit· 1976-11-29· cited 103×
- United States v. Derl GraySixth Circuit· 1973-08-07· cited 86×
- Charles T. Coleman, Sr. v. Michael C. Turpen, District Attorney Bill Vinzant, Sheriff Keifer Wrecker ServiceTenth Circuit· 1983-01-13· cited 81×
- United States v. Gilberto SantanaSecond Circuit· 1973-10-01· cited 77×
- Benavidez v. GunnellTenth Circuit· 1983-12-08· cited 70×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.