Skip to main content
· 2/6/2015

WMI Group, Inc. v. Fox, C.

Citations

  • 109 A.3d 740
  • 39 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1243
  • 2015 Pa. Super. 25
  • 2015 WL 500883
  • 2015 Pa. Super. LEXIS 37

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that this Court may consider documents not included in the record but which are in the reproduced record where neither party disputes the accuracy of the documents
  • Where the certified record did not include necessary exhibits but the reproduced record did so, we would consider the exhibits because they were “part of the reproduced record and neither party ha[d] disputed their accuracy.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Allen, Jenkins, Fitzgerald

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.