Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 6/15/1964

WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo

Citations

  • 377 U.S. 633
  • 84 S. Ct. 1418
  • 12 L. Ed. 2d 568
  • 1964 U.S. LEXIS 1003

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reviewing “an apportionment scheme” that allegedly “result[s] in a significant undervaluation of the weight of the votes of certain of a State’s citizens”
  • “However complicated or sophisticated an apportionment scheme might be, it cannot, consistent with the Equal Protection Clause, result in a significant undervaluation of the weight of the votes of certain of a State’s citizens merely because of where they happen to reside.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Warren, Harlan, Stewart

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

152 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named WMCA, Inc. v. Lomenzo

3 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.