Witty v. Delta Air Lines, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “We hold that federal regulatory requirements for passenger safety warnings and instructions are exclusive and preempt all state standards and requirements.”
• “[E]ach [preemption] case turns on the peculiarities and special features of the federal regulatory scheme in question.”
• “[A]ny warn- ing that passengers should not stay in their seats, but should instead move about to prevent DVT, would necessarily con- flict with any federal determination that, all things considered, passengers are safer in their seats.”
• allowing interlocutory review of preemption issue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).