Green Mountain Chrysler Plymouth Dodge Jeep v. Crombie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• ruling that objections to one of several data sources supporting expert’s conclusions are insufficient to render testimony inadmissible
• finding that “multiple approaches, with various levels of fuel economy, allow compliance with the standard”
• “Overall, the Supreme Court has emphasized the ‘liberal thrust’ of the Federal Rules of Evidence with regard to expert opinion testimony.”
• “Daubert requires general, not universal acceptance; even substantial criticism as to one theory or procedure will not be enough to find that the theory/procedure is not generally accepted.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).