Witt v. Union Oil Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• section designed to prevent franchisors from arbitrarily refusing to renew
• retroactive application would result in an unconstitutional impairment of contract

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

11 cases in this archive cite this case.

• April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTV
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-10-05· cited 222×
• Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-11-24· cited 56×
• Hillsman v. Sutter Community Hospitals
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-03-27· cited 37×
• Bob Hamro v. Shell Oil Co.
  Ninth Circuit· 1982-04-12· cited 29×
• California Arco Distributors, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1984-07-17· cited 18×
• General Aviation, Inc. v. The Cessna Aircraft Company
  Sixth Circuit· 1993-12-21· cited 15×
• Abrahamson v. NME Hospitals, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1987-11-03· cited 14×
• Mobil Oil Corp. v. Rossi
  California Court of Appeal· 1982-12-17· cited 13×
• E. S. Bills, Inc. v. Tzucanow
  California Supreme Court· 1985-06-24· cited 11×
• California Livestock Production Credit Ass'n v. Sutfin
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-01-31· cited 7×
• Davis v. Gulf Oil Corp.
  C.D. California· 1983-08-31· cited 7×

Cites

5 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Bradley v. Superior Court
  California Supreme Court· 1957-05-07· cited 82×
• Mobil Oil Corp. v. Handley
  California Court of Appeal· 1978-01-19· cited 28×
• Union Oil Co. v. Moesch
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-01-05· cited 14×
• R. E. Spriggs Co. v. Adolph Coors Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1979-06-26· cited 12×
• Estate of Gill
  California Court of Appeal· 1971-08-23· cited 7×