Kolling v. Dow Jones & Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff in a Cartwright Act proceeding must show “antitrust injury . . . that is, the type of injury the antitrust laws were intended to prevent, and which flows from the invidious conduct which renders defendants’ acts unlawful.”
• applying California’s “market participant rule” to antitrust standing under the Cartwright Act, which requires a plaintiff to “show an injury within the area of the economy that is endangered by a breakdown of competitive conditions.”
• “Appellants failed to allege antitrust injury ... because they have failed to allege any facts to show they suffered an injury which was caused by restraints on competition.”
• \any combination which tampers with price structures constitutes an unlawful activity.\
• “any combination which tampers with price structures constitutes an unlawful activity.”
• “The analysis under 5 California’s antitrust law mirrors the analysis under federal law because the Cartwright Act, Cal. 6 Bus. & Prof. Code § 16700 et seq., was modeled after the Sherman Act.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• John M. Dimidowich, Dba Micro Image v. Bell & Howell
  Ninth Circuit· 1987-02-25· cited 222×
• Knevelbaard Dairies v. Kraft Foods, Inc.
  Ninth Circuit· 2000-12-01· cited 154×
• Theme Promotions, Inc. v. News America Marketing FSI
  Ninth Circuit· 2008-08-19· cited 139×
• Cellular Plus, Inc. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 1993-03-25· cited 84×
• Fisherman's Wharf Bay Cruise Corp. v. Superior Court
  California Court of Appeal· 2003-12-15· cited 77×
• G.H.I.I. v. MTS, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-09-23· cited 67×
• In re High-Tech Employee Antitrust Litigation
  N.D. California· 2012-04-18· cited 60×
• Chavez v. Whirlpool Corp.
  California Court of Appeal· 2001-10-29· cited 49×
• Bert G. Gianelli Distributing Co. v. Beck & Co.
  California Court of Appeal· 1985-06-10· cited 43×
• In re Wellpoint, Inc. Out-of-Network \UCR\ Rates Litigation
  C.D. California· 2012-09-06· cited 40×
• Salveson v. JP Morgan Chase & Co.
  E.D. New York· 2016-02-24· cited 39×
• In re Libor-Based Financial Instruments Antitrust Litigation
  S.D. New York· 2013-03-29· cited 37×
• Classen v. Weller
  California Court of Appeal· 1983-07-19· cited 32×
• Marsh v. Anesthesia Services Medical Group, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2011-10-06· cited 31×
• City of Oakland v. Oakland Raiders
  Ninth Circuit· 2021-12-02· cited 30×
• International Business MacHines Corporation v. Dr. Christopher H. Bajorek, Chris Bajorek v. International Business MacHines Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1999-09-14· cited 28×
• Maui Jim, Inc. v. Smartbuy Guru Enters.
  E.D. Illinois· 2019-05-10· cited 25×
• Morrison v. Viacom, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1998-09-01· cited 24×
• Redwood Theatres, Inc. v. Festival Enterprises, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 1988-04-22· cited 22×
• Asahi Kasei Pharma Corp. v. Cotherix, Inc.
  California Court of Appeal· 2012-03-05· cited 20×

Cites

58 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Brunswick Corp. v. Pueblo Bowl-O-Mat, Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-01-25· cited 2,155×
• United States v. Socony-Vacuum Oil Co.
  Supreme Court· 1940-06-03· cited 2,153×
• Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.
  Supreme Court· 1977-06-23· cited 1,218×
• United States v. Colgate & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1919-06-02· cited 958×
• United States v. Parke, Davis & Co.
  Supreme Court· 1960-02-29· cited 561×
• Harold D. Blankenship, an Individual v. The Hearst Corporation, a Corporation, William H. Myers, an Individual
  Ninth Circuit· 1975-06-26· cited 521×
• Neal v. Farmers Insurance Exchange
  California Supreme Court· 1978-08-25· cited 473×
• Albrecht v. Herald Co.
  Supreme Court· 1968-04-08· cited 449×
• Simpson v. Union Oil Co. of Cal.
  Supreme Court· 1964-05-25· cited 363×
• Joseph E. Seagram & Sons, Inc. v. Hawaiian Oke & Liquors, Ltd.
  Ninth Circuit· 1969-09-08· cited 222×
• Industrial Building Materials, Inc. v. Interchemical Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1971-02-26· cited 167×
• Hamilton C. Bushie and Doris Ann Bushie v. Stenocord Corporation
  Ninth Circuit· 1972-03-15· cited 167×
• Corwin v. Los Angeles Newspaper Service Bureau, Inc.
  California Supreme Court· 1971-05-17· cited 167×
• C. O. Hanson v. Shell Oil Company
  Ninth Circuit· 1976-09-03· cited 151×
• People v. Robarge
  California Supreme Court· 1953-10-23· cited 134×
• American Motor Inns, Inc. v. Holiday Inns, Inc., International Association of Holiday Inns, Intervenor-Defendant
  Third Circuit· 1975-06-30· cited 133×
• Henderson v. Harnischfeger Corp.
  California Supreme Court· 1974-10-28· cited 124×
• Marquis v. Chrysler Corp.
  Ninth Circuit· 1978-06-29· cited 118×
• Walling v. Kimball
  California Supreme Court· 1941-02-17· cited 113×
• Lemons v. Regents of University of California
  California Supreme Court· 1978-08-21· cited 112×