Skip to main content

Witcher v. Canon City

Citations

  • 716 P.2d 445

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • reasoning that negotiation of leases and amendments thereto between the city and bridge operators were administrative acts not subject to referendum
  • explaining that a party’s failure to challenge evidence presented in support of a motion for summary judgment in the district court waives any such challenge on appeal
  • refusing to read into a city charter an extension of the referendum power to matters purely administrative in character, given the burden that such an extension would place on the operation of local government
  • city's amendment to lease with private company in which city agreed to reduce share of bridge tolls served a valid public purpose
  • a party’s failure to challenge evidence submitted in support of summary judgment in the district court waives any such challenge on appeal
  • authorization of improvements to Royal Gorge Bridge served a valid public purpose of improving and extending life of valuable source of municipal revenue

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Lohr, Erickson, Dubofsky

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.