Denver Urban Renewal Authority v. Byrne

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that impact on city's general fund from bond issuance constituted injury in fact
• strong public purpose served by urban renewal projects; fact that private interests are indirectly benefited does not render plan unconstitutional under Art. XI, § 2
• since there is a strong public purpose served by urban renewal projects, the fact that private interests are indirectly benefited does not result in an unconstitutional donation
• statute governing issuance of tax allocation bonds for urban renewal purposes was general law
• special assessment type argument not addressed for lack of standing
• special assessment type argument not addressed for lack of standing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).