Skip to main content
· 7/12/2006

Wisneski v. State

Citations

  • 905 A.2d 385
  • 169 Md. App. 527
  • 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 106

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
  • deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
  • although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private
  • although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Panel: Hollander

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.