· 7/12/2006
Wisneski v. State
Citations
- 905 A.2d 385
- 169 Md. App. 527
- 2006 Md. App. LEXIS 106
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
- deciding that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in letting the State reopen its case to introduce a stipulation into evidence
- although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private
- although “public place” not defined by statute, common usage and dictionary definition may inform determination whether act public or private
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Panel: Hollander
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.