Skip to main content
Supreme Court· 3/31/1919

Wise v. United States

Citations

  • 249 U.S. 361
  • 39 S. Ct. 303
  • 63 L. Ed. 647
  • 1919 U.S. LEXIS 2134

Syllabus

<p>In a contract for the construction of two government laboratory buildings, it was provided that, in case the completion of the work should be delayed beyond a period allowed, the United States, in view of the difficulty of estimating the resulting damages with exactness, and for the cost of extra inspection and rents, salaries and other expenses that would be entailed, might deduct $200 for each day of delay, until the work should be completed, not. as a penalty, but as liquidated damages, computed, estimated and agreed upon. There was such delay, as to both buildings, that the amount, thus computed, exceeded §20,000. Held, that the fact that the amount specified was to be the same whether both buildings were delayed or only one was not a sufficient reason for considering it a penalty, nor was there other ground for not giving effect to the agreement as a genuine pre-estimate of loss. P. 364. Sun Printing & Publishing Association v. Moore, 183 U. S. 642.</p> <p>Whether a party should be relieved from a plain stipulation for liquidated damages upon the ground that a penalty was really intended, will depend upon the facts of the case and not upon a conjectural situation that might have arisen under the contract. Id.</p>

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • granting summary judgment to the government on plaintiffs claim for reduction in withholding of liquidated damages
  • noting “[t]here is nothing . . . in the record to indicate that the parties did not take into consideration, when estimating the amount of damage which would be caused by delay,” the possibility that the particular delay might occur
  • Liquidated damages may be enforceable when the damages are uncertain in nature or amount or are difficult of ascertainment.

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Clarke

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

92 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Wise v. United States

39 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.