Indiana Supreme Court· 9/8/1952
Wischmeyer v. Finch
Citations
- 107 N.E.2d 661
- 231 Ind. 282
- 1952 Ind. LEXIS 151
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- finding general plan of development where single subdivision plat restricted lots to residential use and type of buildings allowed
- finding general plan of development where single subdivision plat restricted lots to residential use and type of buildings allowed
- interpreting statute in effect at that time to require all owners of a recorded plat of land to provide written approval for the plat to be modified
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Bobbitt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Licocci v. Cardinal Associates, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 73×
- Gordon E. Gouveia, Trustee in Bankruptcy for Kathleen Sue Hiles v. Barbara TazbirSeventh Circuit· 1994-09-29· cited 55×
- William Daniels and Judy Daniels v. The Area Plan Commission of Allen CountySeventh Circuit· 2002-09-11· cited 55×
- Adult Group Properties, Ltd. v. ImlerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-03-24· cited 44×
- Northern Ind. Pub. Serv. Co. v. McCOY ET UX.Indiana Supreme Court· 1959-03-24· cited 35×
- St. John Town Board v. LambertIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-03-28· cited 33×
- Pulos v. JamesIndiana Supreme Court· 1973-10-30· cited 29×
- Smith v. Second Church of Christ, Scientist, PhoenixArizona Supreme Court· 1960-05-11· cited 29×
- King v. EbrensIndiana Court of Appeals· 2004-03-11· cited 20×
- Dunne v. Shenandoah Homeowners Ass'n, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals· 2000-06-01· cited 20×
- Compiano v. KuntzSupreme Court of Iowa· 1975-02-19· cited 19×
- Hrisomalos v. SmithIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-10-19· cited 17×
- Oakes v. HattabaughIndiana Court of Appeals· 1994-03-31· cited 16×
- McIntyre v. BakerIndiana Court of Appeals· 1996-01-16· cited 15×
- Rodgers Et Ux v. Reimann Et UxOregon Supreme Court· 1961-04-19· cited 14×
- Maxwell v. HahnIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-05-26· cited 14×
- Austin v. DurbinIndiana Court of Appeals· 1974-05-16· cited 13×
- Valhouli v. CoulourasSupreme Court of New Hampshire· 1958-06-20· cited 13×
- Drenter v. DuitzIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-04-10· cited 10×
- Vierk v. RitenourIndiana Court of Appeals· 1961-03-08· cited 8×
Cites
13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- City of Indianapolis v. KingsburyIndiana Supreme Court· 1884-12-30· cited 92×
- Cox v. Louisville, New Albany, & Chicago RailroadIndiana Supreme Court· 1874-11-15· cited 75×
- Housing Authority of Gallatin County v. Church of GodIllinois Supreme Court· 1948-09-24· cited 33×
- Codman v. BradleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1909-03-01· cited 29×
- Miller v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court· 1890-04-01· cited 28×
- City of Logansport v. DunnIndiana Supreme Court· 1856-12-13· cited 24×
- Backer v. PyneIndiana Supreme Court· 1892-02-04· cited 20×
- Loomis v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court· 1916-02-16· cited 19×
- Hegarty v. CurtisIndiana Court of Appeals· 1950-12-21· cited 15×
- N. P. Dodge Corp. v. CalderwoodSupreme Court of Kansas· 1940-05-04· cited 11×
- Davis v. HuguenorIllinois Supreme Court· 1951-01-18· cited 10×
- Keesling v. DoyleIndiana Court of Appeals· 1893-11-03· cited 10×
- Shanklin v. City of EvansvilleIndiana Supreme Court· 1876-11-15· cited 2×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.