William Daniels and Judy Daniels v. The Area Plan Commission of Allen County

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that Indiana provides an inverse condemnation action \to recover the value of the property which has been taken in fact\ (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)
• stating that an inverse condemnation claimant need only exhaust administrative procedures for obtaining compensation before bringing their takings claim
• explaining the burden on the government to show the existence of a public use is “remarkably light”
• reviewing de novo a summary judgment order that declared a state law unconstitutional
• recogniz- ing that \the additional ripeness requirements of Williamson County create a takings claim exception to Patsy’s general requirement that exhaustion is not required in § 1983 suits\
• “[T]he additional ripeness requirements of Williamson County create a takings claim exception to Patsy’s general requirement that exhaustion is not required in § 1983 suits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).