Wisam Yousif v. Loretta E. Lynch

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that “[w]hen reviewing a frivolousness finding, we review questions of law de novo”
• remanding for consideration whether asylum applicant’s false statements were material so as to support frivolousness finding
• collecting cases and observing that “the Board and the courts almost uniformly permit an [Immigration Judge] to make a frivolousness finding as long as the [Immigration Judge] finds that the misrepresentations were material to the 877 Cite as 26 I&N Dec. 872 (BIA 2016
• noting no dispute that petitioner was a Chaldean Christian

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).