Second Circuit· 1/16/1978
Winters v. Lavine
Citations
- 574 F.2d 46
- 1978 U.S. App. LEXIS 13038
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Johnson Co. still good law
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Cited by
41 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court· 1980-12-09· cited 4,909×
- Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. TomanioSupreme Court· 1980-05-19· cited 1,250×
- Rr Village Association, Inc., Jay Stanleigh and Authur L. Penzel, Plaintiffs v. Denver Sewer Corporation and Town of Roxbury (New York)Second Circuit· 1987-08-26· cited 95×
- Herrera v. WyomingSupreme Court· 2019-05-20· cited 81×
- Rx Data Corporation, a New York Corporation v. Department of Social Services, an Agency of the State of New YorkSecond Circuit· 1982-06-23· cited 41×
- Unnamed caseThird Circuit· 1987-11-02· cited 41×
- Joseph A. Yacovone v. William F. Bolger, Postmaster General of the U. S.D.C. Circuit· 1981-02-20· cited 34×
- B.N.E. Swedbank, S.A. v. BankerS.D. New York· 1992-06-02· cited 30×
- Cerbone v. County of WestchesterS.D. New York· 1981-02-18· cited 22×
- Spartacus Youth League v. Board of Trustees of the Illinois Industrial UniversityN.D. Illinois· 1980-04-02· cited 19×
- Wright v. National Bank of StamfordN.D. New York· 1985-01-02· cited 18×
- Kremer v. Chemical Construction Corp.S.D. New York· 1979-10-02· cited 16×
- Williams v. CoddS.D. New York· 1978-10-24· cited 13×
- Leigh v. McGuireSecond Circuit· 1979-12-19· cited 10×
- Markel v. BlumN.D. New York· 1981-03-04· cited 8×
- Intellectual Ventures I LLC v. Capital One Financial CorpFederal Circuit· 2019-09-10· cited 8×
- Foss v. Eastern States ExpositionFirst Circuit· 2023-05-10· cited 7×
- Doe v. AnkerS.D. New York· 1978-05-10· cited 6×
- Friarton Estates Corp. v. City of New YorkS.D. New York· 1981-10-02· cited 5×
- Benjamin v. CoughlinS.D. New York· 1986-08-29· cited 5×
Cites
90 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Preiser v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1973-05-07· cited 9,100×
- Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. DoyleSupreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 7,445×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- Village of Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Development Corp.Supreme Court· 1977-01-11· cited 4,496×
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. Chenery Corp.Supreme Court· 1947-06-23· cited 3,981×
- Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court· 1941-03-03· cited 3,480×
- Milliken v. MeyerSupreme Court· 1941-01-20· cited 3,141×
- Zwickler v. KootaSupreme Court· 1967-12-05· cited 1,325×
- Yates v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1957-06-17· cited 1,277×
- East Texas Motor Freight System, Inc. v. RodriguezSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 1,222×
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court· 1942-03-06· cited 895×
- Schwartz v. Public AdministratorNew York Court of Appeals· 1969-02-20· cited 773×
- Angel v. BullingtonSupreme Court· 1947-02-17· cited 644×
- Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods DivisionSecond Circuit· 1964-01-29· cited 480×
- Reetz v. BozanichSupreme Court· 1970-02-25· cited 429×
- Ohio Bureau of Employment Services v. HodorySupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 398×
- Krock v. Electric Motor & Repair Co.Supreme Court· 1964-05-18· cited 274×
- Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of OhioSupreme Court· 1930-05-19· cited 249×
- Getz v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-10-03· cited 234×
- The Evergreens v. NunanSecond Circuit· 1944-04-03· cited 199×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.