Grubb v. Public Util. Comm'n of Ohio

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• party entitled to raise question as to subject-matter jurisdiction “notwithstanding his prior inconsistent attitude”
• questions properly raised in appellant’s brief necessarily resolved against him by affirmance
• “[S]tate and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction of suits of a civil nature arising under the Constitution and laws of the United States, save in exceptional instances where the jurisdiction has been restricted by Congress to the federal courts.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).