Skip to main content

Winston v. Commonwealth

Citations

  • 654 S.E.2d 340
  • 51 Va. App. 74
  • 2007 Va. App. LEXIS 485

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that because an appellant did not include an argument in his questions presented (now assignments of error), the Court would not address it on appeal
  • holding that when an “appellant did not include [an] argument in his [assignments of error], [this Court] will not address it on appeal”
  • holding that because an appellant did not include an argument in his questions presented, the Court would not address it on appeal
  • holding that an appellant’s argument not included in his questions presented was waived on appeal
  • holding that because an appellant did not include an argument in his questions presented (now assignments of error), the Court would not address it on appeal
  • holding that because an appellant did not include an argument in his questions presented (now assignments of error), the Court would not address it on appeal

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robert P. Frank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

14 cases in this archive cite this case.

Cites

14 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.