Winson v. Norman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the alleged presuit expert who \confined his recent professional activities to acting as a 'litigation expert' \ did not satisfy the requirement in chapter 766 of being duly and regularly engaged in the practice of the profession
• concluding that the alleged presuit expert who “confined his recent professional activities to acting as a ‘litigation expert’ ” did not satisfy the requirement in chapter 766 of being duly and regularly engaged in the practice of the profession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).