Winson v. Norman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the alleged presuit expert who \confined his recent professional activities to acting as a 'litigation expert' \ did not satisfy the requirement in chapter 766 of being duly and regularly engaged in the practice of the profession
• concluding that the alleged presuit expert who “confined his recent professional activities to acting as a ‘litigation expert’ ” did not satisfy the requirement in chapter 766 of being duly and regularly engaged in the practice of the profession

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

2 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Largie v. Gregorian
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2005-07-13· cited 17×
• Christopher Moncrief, as Personal Representative of the Estate of Melissa Marie Moncrief v. Charles Edward Kollmer, M.D., and New Smyrna Orthopedics, P.A.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 2024-11-15

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Ingersoll v. Hoffman
  Supreme Court of Florida· 1991-09-26· cited 55×
• Ragoonanan v. Assocs. in Obstetrics & Gynecology
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1993-06-11· cited 21×
• Suarez v. St. Joseph's Hosp., Inc.
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1994-03-23· cited 8×
• Verdi v. Swissco Properties
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1995-07-19· cited 1×