Largie v. Gregorian

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “Requiring a written expert opinion as part of the pre-suit investigation assures the defendant that the claim was preceded by a reasonable investigation; '‘that there is'justification for the Plaintiffs’ claim[.]’ ”
• affirming summary judgment in favor of a nurse “based on the total failure of the [plaintiffs] to demonstrate that, as to this defendant, the presuit investigation requirements of Chapter 766 had been satisfied”
• “While the procedures set forth in Chapter 766 are not intended to deny access to the courts, they are ‘more than mere technicalities.’ ”
• “While the procedures set forth in Chapter 766 are not intended to deny access to the courts, they are ‘more than mere technicalities.’”
• “In construing this statute liberally, courts have recognized that the statutory intent of the pre-suit investigation and notice requirements was to screen out frivolous lawsuits and alleviate the high costs of medical malpractice claims.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).