Winn v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence concerning victims’ trust account was not admissible to show motive because the State never demonstrated the defendant had any knowledge that he was a beneficiary of the trust
• holding evidence concerning victims’ trust account was not admissible to show motive because the State never demonstrated the defendant had any knowledge that he was a beneficiary of the trust

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

6 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Bjorgaard v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-05-02· cited 33×
• Krebsbach v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 1998-04-07· cited 26×
• Eby v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-08-31· cited 11×
• Ronald A. Eby v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 4th Dist. (San Antonio)· 2005-04-06
• James R. Artrip, Jr. v. State of Texas
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2002-02-20
• Christian Bjorgaard v. State
  Tex. App. Ct., 7th Dist. (Amarillo)· 2007-03-29

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Montgomery v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1991-06-19· cited 7,264×
• Harris v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-06-28· cited 1,170×
• Moreno v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1993-04-07· cited 365×
• Orona v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1990-05-16· cited 205×
• Sattiewhite v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1989-10-25· cited 187×
• Bush v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1982-02-03· cited 120×
• Bailey v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1975-09-23· cited 116×
• Jernigan v. State
  Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas· 1979-06-06· cited 11×