Windham v. Honeycutt

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding evidence of oral modification of the real estate contract was violative of the Statute of Frauds
• holding evidence of oral modification of the real estate contract was violative of the Statute of Frauds
• court held evidence of oral modification of the real estate contract as violative of the Statute of Frauds

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

9 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Player v. Chandler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1989-07-31· cited 95×
• SEA PINES PLANTATION COMPANY v. Wells
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1987-11-09· cited 37×
• Windham v. Honeycutt
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1986-08-25· cited 30×
• Beaufort County v. Butler
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1994-11-28· cited 13×
• Paschal v. Causey
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1992-08-10· cited 5×
• State v. McIntyre
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1992-03-02· cited 5×
• Faith Holiness Church v. Church of God at Scranton
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 1984-08-08· cited 2×
• Erin B. Anderson v. Rudy L. Pearson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-03-05
• Erin B. Anderson v. Rudy L. Pearson
  Court of Appeals of South Carolina· 2025-04-16

Cites

4 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

• Rosamond Enterprises, Inc. v. McGranahan
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-06· cited 14×
• Lipscomb v. Poole
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1966-04-11· cited 12×
• American Hardware Supply Co., Inc. v. Whitmire
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1983-01-25· cited 12×
• Conran v. Yager
  Supreme Court of South Carolina· 1975-01-09· cited 11×